Mein Vortrag zur Geldpolitik von März 2013 (und die Situation im Jahr 2015)

Veröffentlicht unter Geldpolitik | Kommentar hinterlassen

Why Central Banks Should Give Money Directly to the People

Ein bedeutender Artikel in Foreign Affairs über Helikoptergeld (QE for the people)


Governments must do better. Rather than trying to spur private-sector spending through asset purchases or interest-rate changes, central banks, such as the Fed, should hand consumers cash directly. In practice, this policy could take the form of giving central banks the ability to hand their countries’ tax-paying households a certain amount of money. The government could distribute cash equally to all households or, even better, aim for the bottom 80 percent of households in terms of income. Targeting those who earn the least would have two primary benefits. For one thing, lower-income households are more prone to consume, so they would provide a greater boost to spending. For another, the policy would offset rising income inequality.

Such an approach would represent the first significant innovation in monetary policy since the inception of central banking, yet it would not be a radical departure from the status quo. Most citizens already trust their central banks to manipulate interest rates. And rate changes are just as redistributive as cash transfers. When interest rates go down, for example, those borrowing at adjustable rates end up benefiting, whereas those who save — and thus depend more on interest income — lose out.

Most economists agree that cash transfers from a central bank would stimulate demand. But policymakers nonetheless continue to resist the notion. In a 2012 speech, Mervyn King, then governor of the Bank of England, argued that transfers technically counted as fiscal policy, which falls outside the purview of central bankers, a view that his Japanese counterpart, Haruhiko Kuroda, echoed this past March. Such arguments, however, are merely semantic. Distinctions between monetary and fiscal policies are a function of what governments ask their central banks to do. In other words, cash transfers would become a tool of monetary policy as soon as the banks began using them.


A second factor explaining the persistence of the old way of doing business involves central banks’ balance sheets. Conventional accounting treats money — bank notes and reserves — as a liability. So if one of these banks were to issue cash transfers in excess of its assets, it could technically have a negative net worth. Yet it makes no sense to worry about the solvency of central banks: after all, they can always print  more money.

The most powerful sources of resistance to cash transfers are political and ideological. In the United States, for example, the Fed is extremely resistant to legislative changes affecting monetary policy for fear of congressional actions that would limit its freedom of action in a future crisis (such as preventing it from bailing out foreign banks). Moreover, many American conservatives consider cash transfers to be socialist handouts. In Europe, which one might think would provide more fertile ground for such transfers, the German fear of inflation that led the European Central Bank to hike rates in 2011, in the middle of the greatest recession since the 1930s, suggests that ideological resistance can be found there, too.


Ideology aside, the main barriers to implementing this policy are surmountable. And the time is long past for this kind of innovation. Central banks are now trying to run twenty-first-century economies with a set of policy tools invented over a century ago. By relying too heavily on those tactics, they have ended up embracing policies with perverse consequences and poor payoffs. All it will take to change course is the courage, brains, and leadership to try something new


Veröffentlicht unter Geldpolitik | Kommentar hinterlassen

Lord Adair Turner: Crisis, Debt Overhang and Deflation

Veröffentlicht unter Geldpolitik | 1 Kommentar

Weltfinanzsystem am Wendepunkt

Ich möchte heute auf einige neue Artikel im „Fazit Blog“ und im Blog „Never Mind the Markets“ hinweisen. Wenn man sie in ihrer Gesamtheit betrachtet, wird einem klar, das unser weltweites Finanz-und Währungssytem an einen Wendepunkt gelangen könnte.

Markus Diem Meier und Mark Dittli (Never Mind) nehmen in ihren Betrachtungen eine Einschätzung des Dollarproblems (Überschuldung der Schwellenländer in Dollar), die Überforderung der Notenbanken sowie eine fehlende politische Koodinierung auf der G-20 Ebene vor. Weiterlesen

Veröffentlicht unter Geldpolitik | Verschlagwortet mit | Kommentar hinterlassen

Wie demokratisch ist Helikoptergeld?

Der Ausgangspunkt der Idee von „Helicopter Money“ war ein abstraktes Gedankenspiel. In technischer Hinsicht ist es eine Kombination von Geldpolitik (Schaffung von Geld) und Fiskalpolitik (Regierung schenkt Geld an Einzelmenschen).

Ökonomen nennen solche Kombinationen als ein mit Geld finanziertes Konjunkturprogramm (money financed fiscal stimulus), beschreibt Simon Wren-Lewis in seinem Blog. Mit dem Aufkommen der QE-Politik (quantitative easing) wird es jetzt auch „QE für die Menschen“ genannt. Weiterlesen

Veröffentlicht unter Geldpolitik | Verschlagwortet mit | Kommentar hinterlassen